Veredictos y acuerdos: el jurado concluye que la empresa era la propietaria efectiva del vehículo involucrado en un accidente por conducir en estado de ebriedad; el cliente recibe $400,000 adicionales

Kanner & Pintaluga le dan la bienvenida a Joel Ortega en Coral Gables
30 de noviembre de 2021
traumatic brain injuries
Tipos de lesiones cerebrales y sus consecuencias
diciembre 4, 2021

Veredictos y acuerdos: el jurado concluye que la empresa era la propietaria efectiva del vehículo involucrado en un accidente por conducir en estado de ebriedad; el cliente recibe $400,000 adicionales

composite image

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Estados Unidos – Earlier this week a Broward Jury concluded that vehicle driven by a drunk driver that caused a head on collision was a company vehicle allowing our client to recover an additional $400,000.

In 2011, our client was hit head on by a drunk driver who was visiting Broward County on a work trip. The crash took place after hours, while the defendant driver was off the clock, but involved a car that was paid for and maintained by the company the defendant driver worked for. There was no dispute that our client suffered a serious neck injury that required surgery as a result of the crash.  Several years ago the defendant driver and her estate settled with our client but the defendant company disputed ownership of the vehicle and responsibility for the crash causing the case to drag on.

The company’s position was that their employee, the defendant driver, was acting outside of her scope of employment and that the at-fault vehicle was not owned by the company because it was titled in someone else’s name. Our client, represented by KP trial attorneys Joseph Abdallah y Richard Rosenblum, argued that the company was the “beneficial owner” of the vehicle at the time of the crash because the company had taken over payments on the vehicle, paid for the regular maintenance, gas, and other related vehicle expenses.  As a beneficial owner, the company bore a portion of the responsibility for the damages caused.

The matter proceeded to trial on whether the company was the beneficial owner with the parties entering into a high-low settlement agreement. Following the presentation of evidence, the jury determined that the driver’s company was in fact the beneficial owner and is required to cover the damages caused by its driver.  Per the pre-trial agreement, the client was awarded an additional $400,000 in damages.

el caso es Pablo Vivanco v. Margaret A. Collins, as special Administrator of the Estate of Anita McConnell and All Florida Water Treatments, LLC, Case No.: CACE-12-002590 in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida.

Consigue lo que mereces
Kanner & Pintaluga es una firma demandante nacional agresiva, ética y orientada a resultados comprometida a representar a víctimas de accidentes, lesiones graves y daños a la propiedad. Con un equipo de casi 100 abogados, tenemos la experiencia y los conocimientos para lograr el resultado más favorable para nuestros clientes. Si podemos ayudarlo o si simplemente desea hablar con un abogado para obtener la ayuda que necesita, no dude en contactarnos. Nuestro equipo siempre está disponible para discutir sus derechos y asegurarse de que usted y su familia estén protegidos.

es_MXSpanish